Frankenstien nature v nurture

An example of the creature being free is when he explains that before society he ate, slept and acted like an animal; eating berries and nuts, drinking from the brook and sleeping in the woods.

Frankenstien nature v nurture

Ossa Certified Educator Your statement is correct in terms of the inexact nature of the monster. Chapter IV of Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein explains in detail the way in which a then-obsessed Victor Frankenstein collected what he calls his "working materials", in order to create the body that he intended to infuse with life.

I collected bones from charnel-houses; and disturbed, with profane fingers, the tremendous secrets of the human frame. With this information, it is true that Your statement is correct in terms of the inexact nature of the monster.

Frankenstien nature v nurture

Chapter IV of Mary Shelley 's novel Frankenstein explains in detail the way in which a then-obsessed Victor Frankenstein collected what he calls his "working materials", in order to create the body that he intended to infuse with life. With this information, it is true that the argument that nature built the monster's identity would be nullified since there is no uniformity nor predictability that can be gathered from the genetic origin of each of the creature 's body parts.

However, what if your argument by-passes genetics and moves into the phenotypical features of the creature? Think about the unique nature of the monster; it does not belong to any known species.

Frankenstien nature v nurture

It is still "human" based on its genotype but it cannot be classified under any human species category. And yet, even though it is an abnormal creature, it still is a social creature with a clear need of acceptance, validation, and companionship. The information above can help you create a new argument, still in favor of nature: In other words, that the first shock in the creature's life was not the way that he was treated, but the realization that his appearance was unnatural, inhuman, and revolting.

Any normal individual can tolerate the injustice of being mistreated if there is a backbone of support to which one can return to reinforce self-assurance, awareness, and dignity.

Nurture vs. Nature in the Novel "Frankenstein" - In Frankenstein, various themes are introduced. There are dangerous knowledge, sublime nature, nature versus nurture, monstrosity, and secrecy and guilt. I chose a main theme as nature versus nurture. Nature is some traits that a person is born with, and nurture is an environment that surrounds a. The nature versus nurture controversy is used to attempt to answer the question, what makes you you? Nature (our genes) and nurture (our environment) affect our individual differences in behavior, mental processes, and personality. By: Mary Shelley Frankenstein Nurture Works Cited - The creature began life fresh and innocent similar to that of a newborn -The creature became a true "monster" after enduring hatred from humans he longed to .

Yet, the creature cannot do that. When he realizes "what" he is, and not "who" he is, all of his internal thoughts and feelings become hardened with the question of identity. As a result, he is forced to adopt an identity based on what he represents in the eyes of the world; he cannot be or act like a normal man, for he is not welcome in normal society.

He cannot opt to act like an animal, because he is not that, either. Hence, his only choice is to identify himself as what he appears to be: This is the part of the novel where the creature finds the manuscripts of his creation, and finally understands his true nature; notice that, although the creature had been suffering from the treatment of others, he still does not really realize what he is until this point.

This is the moment where his identity as a monster is finalized; it is here when he finds out that he really was meant to be a sort of monster by his own creator. It is all explained in the following quite.

Expert Answers

Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust? God, in pity, made man beautiful and alluring, after his own image; but my form is a filthy type of yours, more horrid even from the very resemblance.

Satan had his companions, fellow-devils, to admire and encourage him; but I am solitary and abhorred.Nature and Nurture in Frankenstein. 5 Pages Words March “man’s nature at birth is good.” Rousseau is a well-known French philosopher of the 18th century who has once states in his theory on the natural man that one is born free and good but is corrupted by society.

One’s personality, therefore, is determined by nurture. Both nature and nurture contribute to the monsters behavior. However Mary Shelley suggests that nurture plays more of a role in the monsters development.

By: Mary Shelley Frankenstein Nurture Works Cited - The creature began life fresh and innocent similar to that of a newborn -The creature became a true "monster" after enduring hatred from humans he longed to .

By the time the monster demands a mate from Frankenstein, the culmination of the monster's personality and behavioral traits through both nature and nurture have been presented. Although inherently good, the creature has become hardened, evil, and desperate. Nature versus Nurture?

The nature versus nurture controversy is used to attempt to answer the question, what makes you you? Nature (our genes) and nurture (our environment) affect our individual differences in behavior, mental processes, and personality. Together, . The nature versus nurture controversy is used to attempt to answer the question, what makes you you?

Nature (our genes) and nurture (our environment) affect our individual differences in behavior, mental processes, and personality.

free essay on Nature Vs Nurture In Frankenstein